<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Patchlog - Latest Comments in drupal.org is more popular then youtube.com</title><link>http://patchlog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://patchlog.disqus.com/drupalorg_is_more_popular_then_youtubecom/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:25:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: drupal.org is more popular then youtube.com</title><link>http://patchlog.com/oss/drupalorg-is-more-popular-then-youtubecom/#comment-2803618</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Page rank is about how many back links from relevant sites you have. &lt;a href="http://Drupal.org" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Drupal.org"&gt;Drupal.org&lt;/a&gt;  was registered in 2001 and &lt;a href="http://youtube.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="youtube.com"&gt;youtube.com&lt;/a&gt; in 2005, of course you could get more back links in 6 years then in 2. Maybe drupal is more popular then youtube for those that are into web development or cms ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mihai.secasiu</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:25:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: drupal.org is more popular then youtube.com</title><link>http://patchlog.com/oss/drupalorg-is-more-popular-then-youtubecom/#comment-2803619</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pagerank has nothing to do with being "more popular" ...in then sense that you probably mean - visits.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:13:22 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>